Move your loan in the right direction
The standard progression when dealing with change involves three stages: awareness, transition, and new reality. Whether change occurs gradually or hits like a lightning bolt, when we do become aware of it we may feel overwhelmed, shocked, outraged. If we perceive it to be negative or threatening, we may slip back into old behavior to help cope with it. We ask ourselves, “What’s happening?” or, “Why is this happening to me?” Even if we perceive the change to be positive, we can be anxious. Remember how it felt when you went to that job interview you were so excited about?
Once we acknowledge the change, we begin to feel lost—like we are stumbling in the dark.We know the past is changing, but we’re not quite sure what the future looks like. This is the transition stage. During transition we spend time reflecting on the future, think about what we want, and take action to help move us in that direction. At this point other people help ground us and give us input to gain clarity about our future and the new reality. As the new reality begins to take shape, we feel stronger.We know more about ourselves and what we want.We’re ready to take action and set new goals for ourselves.
Credit exposure to foreign currencies
European telecom companies have their operations primarily in Europe. Therefore, exposure to foreign currencies is very limited with the exception of Telefonica’s exposure to Latin America and Deutsche Telekom’s US subsidiaries. While in other industries an appreciating Euro increases competition, it appears that this effect should be negligible for the established European telecom services companies. The barriers of entry seem to be high enough to guarantee broadly stable market shares in the coming years. Since many of the telecom companies have a material fraction of their debt in US dollars, they would benefit from a strengthening Euro.
It is in the nature of financial institutions to have exposure to a variety of currencies. Exchange rate risk is therefore translational rather than transactional. By and large, long-term currency risk is primarily taken in the form of subsidiaries. Currency fluctuations change the value of the equity invested, hence are reflected in the balance sheet rather than in the P&L. Of the larger European banking groups, ABN Amro, BNP Paribas and Royal Bank of Scotland have substantial retail banking operations in the United States. In the insurance sector, Aegon, AXA, ING Verzekeringen and Prudential stand out in terms of US exposure.
A currency mismatch between credit and revenues
Transaction risk arises when a company has a currency mismatch between its costs and revenues, that is, revenues are generated in one currency while costs are denominated in another, the reporting currency. The sustained depreciation of the US dollar since February 2002, for example, has negatively affected the P&L and cash flow statements of European exporters.
Although it proves difficult to obtain a breakdown of the cost structure of a company by currency, the automotive sector and the aerospace sector seem to be hit most by transaction risk.
Therefore, many companies try to offset at least a part of their currency exposure via natural hedging. That is, they try to match currency flows that result from exports and imports of goods and services. A high degree of flexibility with respect to input factors and capacity utilization of plants in different regions also provides an effective hedge against adverse currency movements. Another possibility of reducing currency risk is through derivatives, primarily forward exchange contracts and currency options. In our experience most companies that are significantly exposed to currency risk use some form of derivatives hedging. Yet, most contracts are set up for a period of 1–2 years at most. In the long term, it is difficult for companies to assess their demand for hedging because they have no reliable information
about the future demand for their products and services so that the future cost and earnings situation is unknown. For longer term trends in exchange rates, natural hedging usually is more effective. Credit analysts often lack a thorough insight in currency hedging strategies, especially with regard to derivatives hedging. Since they are hardly able to assess the true currency exposure in the short term, they tend to prefer the longer term and more transparent natural hedging strategies.